I’ve just been catching-up with someone who WAO has collaborated with before. The word ‘manifesting’ came up in a kind-of-jokey way about the work we want to do together. I’m not a believer in magical thinking, but it did get me thinking about being open and direct about the kind of work that you want to do.
Last year, in a post entitled Practical utopias and rewilding work, we shared the following graphic which shows the kind of areas we’re interested in working.
Just because there’s fewer jobs and consulting opportunities around doesn’t mean there’s less work that needs doing in the world. Look around you: the climate is a disaster, information is in silos, hiring is broken, hierarchical governance is a nightmare, and work is far from being ‘sustainable’.
I want to work on these issues in ways where I get to use what I’m learning through my MSc in Systems Thinking. To be honest, I’m a bit jaded with former clients setting hard boundaries around our work when it depends on other areas of their organisation or sector. Working systemically allows us to take a step back and think bigger-picture.
👋 If you’re reading this and want to have a chat or discuss things further, get in touch! I’m here: [email protected]
Unless I’m on holiday, I hardly ever take photos any more. I’m not sure why that is. So, instead, I’ve asked DALL-E 3 to create an image based on this post. Note the woman running the wrong way on the treadmill.
AI is weird; I should take more photos.
We’re getting towards the time of the year when I start to actually have some energy to do new things. No longer in need of my SAD lamp to provide brightness to my day, I transition to a mode which I consider to be my default, but which only really lasts between March and September. Which pretty much coincides with hayfever season for me. Weird.
This week, Laura‘s been away so I’ve been working with John and Anne, but mainly alone. I forget that, for many people based at home who don’t co-work on a daily basis, this is ‘normal’ behaviour. John and I did some preparation for end-of-year finances, as our co-op celebrates its founding on May 1st (International Workers Day) and so we align our financial year with that. Anne and I ran a Community Conversations workshop, recorded a shorter version for those who couldn’t make it, and then embedded the video into a blog post entitled The Power of Community Knowledge Management.
Anne and I also carried out another user research interview for Participate, I had chats with a few people, and gave feedback on potential updates to the LER Ecosystem Map. The latter was also the focus of some of my MSc work this week, and I created first a systems map, and then updated my post to include an ‘audience ikigai’ style map. Both are incomplete, subjective, and currently only partially useful.
I’m learning more about Critical Social Learning Systems (CSLS) at the moment, and wrote the following while studying in the library:
Outside of work and study, I went to a local climate action reading group meeting and wrote up some thoughts. I ran every other day, still on the treadmill as it’s too cold/wet outside at the moment. I’ve gone back to making my Strava activities private, partly because it was getting a little too performative, and partly because I read Audrey’s post on un-tracking. Ironically enough, although I don’t intend to ditch my Garmin smartwatch any time soon, I did accidentally leave it charging when I went to the gym this morning.
Over on Thought Shrapnel, I published a bunch of things, but will draw your attention to one called Hope vs Natality. It’s a follow-up to the one I wrote after going to the climate action reading group, and is in response to reading an article in Aeon suggested by Will Richardson. I’ve just realised that I started following Will’s work over two decades ago now. I’m old.
Talking of following people’s work, this week I came across the portfolio/blog of Pascal Wicht, a “strategic designer, creative director, field researcher, futurist and teacher”. There are enough overlaps between our work and lives for me to find Wicht’s work deeply fascinating, and so I spent a good amount of time rabbitholing. He’s currently got access to an alpha of Midjourney 6, and has produced some incredible images around what he calls post-Holocene habitat systems.
It’s Mother’s Day today, so I’ll be going around to see mine later with a card and some flowers. I’ve also bought her a brand-new-second-hand Kindle, as it turns out she was still using the Kindle Keyboard 3G that I passed on to her ages ago. It’s stopped charging. Happy Mothering Sunday also to my wonderful wife, Hannah, who I made breakfast in bed this morning. We had to get up early to leave in for my daughter’s football match. Once we were completely ready, it was called off due to the rain 🙄
Next week, I’m hoping that we start planning our next in-person WAO meetup. We’d considered aligning this with MozFest House in Amsterdam, as we did last year. However, now that the dates have been announced, that doesn’t work for Anne or for me, so we’ll need to make other plans. I fancy Barcelona. But then I always fancy Barcelona, as it’s a great city.
I’m meeting my MSc tutor on Wednesday which should just be a formality as I’m on-track for my End of Module Assessment (EMA). I’ve got quite a bit of a reading to do for my EMA, so I’m going to have to get cracking on that this week, too. Other than that, and selling some more stuff on eBay before we move house, it’s shaping up to be a pretty normal week.
As part of my preparations for my End of Module Assessment (EMA) I need to create a diagram giving an overview of an ecosystem I’m trying to help influence. Having already created diagrams from the perspective of the Digital Credentials Consortium (DCC) with which WAO is working, I’ve decided to try and take on the concept of Learning and Employment Records (LERs).
We’re currently helping the DCC think about what might go into an updated version of the LER Ecosystem Map. Given that LER is a term which is currently specific to the US context, I’m using this as an opportunity to braid my theoretical and practical understanding of how all of this fits together. Although I’ve worked with US-based organisations and visited there many times, I have no lived experience of the country nor of its systems.
The above image from the LER map is colourful and nice to look at, but in my opinion does not help the visitor understand the ecosystem. Although my needs may be different to, say, employers or learners, I have come at this from an organisational point of view, trying to categorise them based on interest and objective.
While I’ve tried to make this as clear as possible it is confusing to me as well as to others I know who are more deeply immersed in it. Ideally, I would be able to represent this map in three dimensions.
(click/tap to enlarge)
Although I have interacted with representatives from some of the organisations mentioned on here, it is a very different landscape to a decade ago when I was working on Open Badges at Mozilla. It’s almost as if the digital credentialing landscape has fractured into three:
Skills-based hiring (LERs)
Academic-adjacent courses (microcredentials)
Holistic recognition of skills, etc. (Open Recognition)
One of the criticisms I have of the LER Ecosystem Map as it currently stands is that it appears to have been created by committee. It is unclear who is it is for, and as such there are multiple, competing, overlapping understandings of the ecosystem.
I have the following questions in terms of where there might be a need for a more systemic perspective:
What is the future we are collectively trying to imagine? Beyond helping HR departments more accurately and efficiently match workers to jobs, how do LERs make the world a better place?
Over and above lending an air of integrity, what is the role of academia in the LER ecosystem?
Where is the voice of the learner, earner, or worker in this system, beyond being the subject of research?
I’m sure other questions will come to me as I think about this and work more on the LER map. It’s been an interesting exercise, though, just to look at what the different organisations do and try to categorise and classify them on my (incomplete, subjective) systems map.
Update: it’s not a systems map as such, but a day later I realised that WAO’s Audience Ikigai template could be useful for this work. So I had a go trying to map the LER landscape using only four thematic areas: