<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four ways to understand organizational change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2009/06/26/four-ways-to-understand-organizational-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2009/06/26/four-ways-to-understand-organizational-change/</link>
	<description>Education, Technology, Productivity.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:36:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dougbelshaw.com/blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Leadership Day roundup</title>
		<link>http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2009/06/26/four-ways-to-understand-organizational-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2589</link>
		<dc:creator>dougbelshaw.com/blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Leadership Day roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/?p=2464#comment-2589</guid>
		<description>[...] Four ways to understand organizational change [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Four ways to understand organizational change [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Richardson</title>
		<link>http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2009/06/26/four-ways-to-understand-organizational-change/comment-page-1/#comment-3357</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/?p=2464#comment-3357</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff. Yes, organisations can be like brains, but they can also operate in any of the numerous other modes which Morgan elaborates (including prisons!). Other connections with autopoiesis also exist via cybernetics (see Beer and others e.g at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm&lt;/a&gt;). I am especially interested in how organisations can become more flexible in the face of changing technology, and I think that an understanding of the different &#039;faces&#039; or organisations as Morgan proposes may help us to effect change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. Yes, organisations can be like brains, but they can also operate in any of the numerous other modes which Morgan elaborates (including prisons!). Other connections with autopoiesis also exist via cybernetics (see Beer and others e.g at <a href="http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm</a>). I am especially interested in how organisations can become more flexible in the face of changing technology, and I think that an understanding of the different &#39;faces&#39; or organisations as Morgan proposes may help us to effect change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Richardson</title>
		<link>http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2009/06/26/four-ways-to-understand-organizational-change/comment-page-1/#comment-3038</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/?p=2464#comment-3038</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff. Yes, organisations can be like brains, but they can also operate in any of the numerous other modes which Morgan elaborates (including prisons!). Other connections with autopoiesis also exist via cybernetics (see Beer and others e.g at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm&lt;/a&gt;). I am especially interested in how organisations can become more flexible in the face of changing technology, and I think that an understanding of the different &#039;faces&#039; or organisations as Morgan proposes may help us to effect change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. Yes, organisations can be like brains, but they can also operate in any of the numerous other modes which Morgan elaborates (including prisons!). Other connections with autopoiesis also exist via cybernetics (see Beer and others e.g at <a href="http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm</a>). I am especially interested in how organisations can become more flexible in the face of changing technology, and I think that an understanding of the different &#39;faces&#39; or organisations as Morgan proposes may help us to effect change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Richardson</title>
		<link>http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2009/06/26/four-ways-to-understand-organizational-change/comment-page-1/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/?p=2464#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff. Yes, organisations can be like brains, but they can also operate in any of the numerous other modes which Morgan elaborates (including prisons!). Other connections with autopoiesis also exist via cybernetics (see Beer and others e.g at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm&lt;/a&gt;). I am especially interested in how organisations can become more flexible in the face of changing technology, and I think that an understanding of the different &#039;faces&#039; or organisations as Morgan proposes may help us to effect change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. Yes, organisations can be like brains, but they can also operate in any of the numerous other modes which Morgan elaborates (including prisons!). Other connections with autopoiesis also exist via cybernetics (see Beer and others e.g at <a href="http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cybsoc.org/contacts/people-Beer.htm</a>). I am especially interested in how organisations can become more flexible in the face of changing technology, and I think that an understanding of the different &#39;faces&#39; or organisations as Morgan proposes may help us to effect change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
