Comments on: What is ‘digital literacy’? It’s certainly not this… http://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2008/04/27/what-is-digital-literacy-its-certainly-not-this/ Education. Technology. Productivity. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Marco Polohttp://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2008/04/27/what-is-digital-literacy-its-certainly-not-this/comment-page-1/#comment-723 Marco Polo Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:58:11 +0000 http://www.dougbelshaw.com/?p=503#comment-723 You already have 3 "puffers of righteous indignation" so let me offer this for variety: caveat emptor. It says Microsoft right up there at the top of the page. Anyone who thinks that a for-profit company is going to sink several hundred man-hours developing something that may not help sell more product (either directly or indirectly, in the short- or long-term) needs their head examined. Especially, as this curriculum "is ... available at no cost." You already have 3 “puffers of righteous indignation” so let me offer this for variety: caveat emptor. It says Microsoft right up there at the top of the page. Anyone who thinks that a for-profit company is going to sink several hundred man-hours developing something that may not help sell more product (either directly or indirectly, in the short- or long-term) needs their head examined. Especially, as this curriculum “is … available at no cost.”

]]> By: Glenn Wiebehttp://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2008/04/27/what-is-digital-literacy-its-certainly-not-this/comment-page-1/#comment-722 Glenn Wiebe Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:42:42 +0000 http://www.dougbelshaw.com/?p=503#comment-722 Doug, It seems like most digital lit curricula are simply platforms to push product - even the well-known Intel Teach to the Future focuses on MS tools at the expense of others. We do some simple, two day trainings that we've titled Digital Literacy and started with the following definition: “The ability to use digital technology, communication tools or networks to locate, evaluate, use and create information.” It's a definition that is in a lot of places but it's one that made sense to us. And because we're working with teachers, not students, it's one that they can use to help think about ways to integrate tech into their instruction. We have also shortened it a bit so teachers have a simple walkaway: Create Collaborate Communicate Thanks for the insight! glennw historytech.wordpress.com Doug,

It seems like most digital lit curricula are simply platforms to push product – even the well-known Intel Teach to the Future focuses on MS tools at the expense of others.

We do some simple, two day trainings that we’ve titled Digital Literacy and started with the following definition:

“The ability to use digital technology, communication tools or networks to locate, evaluate, use and create information.”

It’s a definition that is in a lot of places but it’s one that made sense to us. And because we’re working with teachers, not students, it’s one that they can use to help think about ways to integrate tech into their instruction.

We have also shortened it a bit so teachers have a simple walkaway:

Create
Collaborate
Communicate

Thanks for the insight!

glennw
historytech.wordpress.com

]]> By: David Muirhttp://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2008/04/27/what-is-digital-literacy-its-certainly-not-this/comment-page-1/#comment-721 David Muir Mon, 28 Apr 2008 08:34:19 +0000 http://www.dougbelshaw.com/?p=503#comment-721 Parts of it look very like the ECDL (which I'm not overly impressed with). It also looks like there is a strong emphasis on systems (aka Windows operating systems!) and business applications (aka Microsoft Office). It may be that the "Computer Security and Privacy" and the "Digital Lifestyles" courses are more interesting but it is difficult to say for sure as the course outline you can view on the web is very light on detail. For example, Information literacy ideas might be there in the Computer Security and Privacy course, but it is hard to tell from the outline. In theory I should be able to look at the course outline (in more detail?) in Word format... but what I actually get is the opportunity to download an exe file - not much use on a Mac. I tried launching the online assessment - but it doesn't work with Firefox on a Mac. I could go to a Windoze machine and investigate this a bit further... but it has to be said I'm not inspired to try. Conspicuous by its absence is any mention of social networking/Web 2.0/Read-Write web stuff. Also, the Digital Lifestyles course seems big on "Explain", "Describe" and "Identify" but lack any mention of "Create"! We are currently looking at the Digital Cre8tor course. Do you have any experience/thoughts on that course? Parts of it look very like the ECDL (which I'm not overly impressed with). It also looks like there is a strong emphasis on systems (aka Windows operating systems!) and business applications (aka Microsoft Office). It may be that the "Computer Security and Privacy" and the "Digital Lifestyles" courses are more interesting but it is difficult to say for sure as the course outline you can view on the web is very light on detail. For example, Information literacy ideas might be there in the Computer Security and Privacy course, but it is hard to tell from the outline. In theory I should be able to look at the course outline (in more detail?) in Word format… but what I actually get is the opportunity to download an exe file – not much use on a Mac. I tried launching the online assessment – but it doesn't work with Firefox on a Mac. I could go to a Windoze machine and investigate this a bit further… but it has to be said I'm not inspired to try.

Conspicuous by its absence is any mention of social networking/Web 2.0/Read-Write web stuff. Also, the Digital Lifestyles course seems big on "Explain", "Describe" and "Identify" but lack any mention of "Create"!

We are currently looking at the Digital Cre8tor course. Do you have any experience/thoughts on that course?

]]> By: Carl Andersonhttp://dougbelshaw.com/blog/2008/04/27/what-is-digital-literacy-its-certainly-not-this/comment-page-1/#comment-720 Carl Anderson Mon, 28 Apr 2008 05:58:09 +0000 http://www.dougbelshaw.com/?p=503#comment-720 This is absolutely shameless. After Microsoft lost a huge lawsuit requiring them to give a bunch of money to schools to purchase technology (at least in the US) because of anti-trust violations. The idea that they would develop a curriculum for schools, which no doubt many schools will take hook line and sinker, is simply shameless. Private companies and manufacturers have no business writing curriculum for schools anyway. Any bias they have will be blatantly shown in their product (or in the promotion of their products through the curriculum). This is like if Nike developed a physical education curriculum and took the stance that their shoes were the heart and soul (no pun intended) of all physical activity. This is absolutely shameless. After Microsoft lost a huge lawsuit requiring them to give a bunch of money to schools to purchase technology (at least in the US) because of anti-trust violations. The idea that they would develop a curriculum for schools, which no doubt many schools will take hook line and sinker, is simply shameless. Private companies and manufacturers have no business writing curriculum for schools anyway. Any bias they have will be blatantly shown in their product (or in the promotion of their products through the curriculum). This is like if Nike developed a physical education curriculum and took the stance that their shoes were the heart and soul (no pun intended) of all physical activity.

]]>